Birthright citizenship under threat.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments regarding birthright citizenship following a challenge to the executive order signed by Donald Trump on January 20, 2025.

Legal experts warn that this debate extends beyond immigration; it could set a precedent that reshapes constitutional interpretation. And once that door is opened, no right would be fully guaranteed.

Marielena Hincapié, a lawyer and visiting scholar at Cornell Law School in Washington, attended the hearing and described the atmosphere inside the courtroom.

Hincapié noted that President Donald Trump’s presence in the courtroom was perceived as an attempt at intimidation.

Nevertheless, she believes the Supreme Court could rule in favor of upholding this constitutional right.

According to Hincapié, the justices are aware that this case involves a fundamental right protected by the Constitution.

During the hearing, historical precedents were recalled—such as a 1928 case involving the Chinese community—which was cited as a reference.

The expert emphasizes the importance of learning from history, noting times when many people lacked documentation yet were still considered part of the country.

Finally, Hincapié warns of the potential consequences should the Court rule in favor of Trump’s executive order.

It is worth noting that the Supreme Court’s decision is expected in June or July of this year.